This archive provides information describing the content, methodology and implementation of census and survey conducted by the NSO of Mongolia, as well as descriptions of micro data files with the variable documentation.

Home › REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SURVEY › RHS 2003 › Data Collection

Mongolia - RHS 2003

Reference ID	MNG-NSO-EN-RHS-2003-v3.0
Year	2003
Country	Mongolia
Producer(s)	National Statistical Office of Mongolia
Sponsor(s)	United Nations Population Fund - UNFPA - Financial and technical assistance for conduct of the Survey
Collection(s)	Reproductive Health Survey
Metadata	Download DDI Download RDF

Created on	Jul 18, 2013
Last modified	Jul 08, 2014
Page views	512261
Downloads	13575

• Study Description
• Data Dictionary
• Get Microdata
• Related Materials

• Overview
• Sampling
• Data Collection
• Data Processing
• Data Appraisal

Data Collection

Data Collection Dates

Start	End	Cycle
2003-09-04	2003-12-26	N/A

Data Collection Mode

Face-to-face [f2f]

Data Collection Notes

From 10 August to 1 September 2003, training was held for interviewers. Each team consisted of 4 female interviewers, a male interviewer. Data collection activities started with the appointment of 10 teams with 7 members in each. When the data collection activities started winter was very near, therefore, it was planned to first cover the mountainous west and forested regions of the country, then Gobi and central regions and lastly Ulaanbaatar city. Data collection started on 4 September and terminated 26 December 1998. Data collection progress was reported weekly to the survey headquarters at the NSO. A number of persons from aimag, city, soum, district, baghs or horoos (around 560 persons in cumulative number) provided great assistance and collaboration during the fieldwork operation.

Data Collectors

Name	Abbreviation	Affiliation
National Statistical Office of Mongolia	NSO	Parliament of Mongolia

Supervision

Each team consisted an editor and a supervisor. Editors were appointed for each team, so that editors and supervisors were able to edit questionnaires daily and correct them by going back to the households when necessary. This way of organizing fieldwork ensured high quality and reliable information.